Re:SQL is 43 years old – Here’s why we still use it today
by brudgers on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @10:14AM
(#14246461)
My apologies for not being clear. By "data structures" I meant data structures and by implication that COBOL provided an abstraction over bytes in memory or on persistent storage media. The premise of my statement is that SQL is also an abstraction over bytes in memory or on persistent storage media in similar use cases.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.