Well, I would like to include more, in fact I would include Ligthsail for sure if they offered a datacenter in Europe. But to start something like this you have to start small, or the costs will bury you pretty son. As a pet and personal project, the way to limit the cost was setting a clear seat of boundaries, like plans under $5 and available in Europe. And being one-man band to make this affordable in terms of time and effort I had to keep it small at the beginning. I worked on this in my spare time for more than two months. If I find a way to sustain the costs, or the providers itself offer me a way to test their machines, I have no problem to expand the comparison. But in the meantime, I share the tools because I knew from the beginning that I only have limited resources. And after all, reproducibility, independence and transparency are the keys IMHO to have a trustful comparison.
Re:Show HN: VPS Comparison – Automated tests to compare VPS ...
by neom on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @08:42AM
(#14245864)
I am not easily impressed when it comes to vps and cloud stuff, but this is very impressive. Kudos. Curious why you didn't include ec2?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: VPS Comparison – Automated tests to compare VPS ...
by joedicastro on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @05:32PM
(#14250811)
Thanks! Very kind of you!
Re:Show HN: VPS Comparison – Automated tests to compare VPS ...
by merb on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @09:21AM
(#14246100)
ec2 is different however lightsail would be comparable. sadly there is still no instance outside US.
Re:Show HN: VPS Comparison – Automated tests to compare VPS ...
by neom on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @01:27PM
(#14248450)
Why is ec2 different?
Re:Show HN: VPS Comparison – Automated tests to compare VPS ...
by merb on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @01:41PM
(#14248613)
you can combine different network adapters/storage options and instance types and also create your own virtual network, with various other options.
while these VPS providers only allow a specific amount of storage for a specific type of instance and also have a included traffic option while ec2 does not have that.
I mean more and more VPS providers have an API, but they still don't have the customizability and services like a cloud has, yet they are preferable in many use cases.