News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on PfSense 2.5 and AES-NI. Parent comment

Re:PfSense 2.5 and AES-NI by pfsense-ivork on Monday May 01, 2017 @06:49PM (#14242458)
You were banned because you violated rules. You were incredibly rude and then even threatened us. If that wasn't enough you attempted to start a brand new drama thread. "Cash grab thing" assertion proves we were right to ban you.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PfSense 2.5 and AES-NI by nalllar on Monday May 01, 2017 @06:53PM (#14242485)
You've just gone and accused Gamblore of being someone who they aren't.

You told me to "Chill for 30 days". Maybe you need to chill instead of damaging your brand by lashing out at people?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PfSense 2.5 and AES-NI by pfsense-ivork on Monday May 01, 2017 @06:58PM (#14242522)
I think it's you who don't know who Gamblore is.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PfSense 2.5 and AES-NI by nalllar on Monday May 01, 2017 @06:59PM (#14242539)
Gamblore can't be i_mormon_stuff, since i_mormon_stuff also has an account here under the same name and posted in this same thread.

Was there a third user you banned?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PfSense 2.5 and AES-NI by pfsense-ivork on Monday May 01, 2017 @07:20PM (#14242661)
Nope, just you and i_mormon_stuff. I still think it's him, but lets see if he ever responds.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PfSense 2.5 and AES-NI by Gamblore on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @02:06AM (#14244280)
when you start a riot with your users you may get very paranoid like this guy.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PfSense 2.5 and AES-NI by pfsense-ivork on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @02:18PM (#14249041)
Apologies, considering your exaggerated remark "lot's of bans going on" I assumed you were one of two (and only two) persons banned.
[ Parent | on HN ]