Re:Facebook Australia allowed advertisers to target teens’ e...
by randomdude10 on Monday May 01, 2017 @06:19AM
(#14236558)
Pays the mortgage. And its better than working for Wall St, the NSA, Indian body shop or random chaotic startup.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Facebook Australia allowed advertisers to target teens’ e...
by beagle3 on Monday May 01, 2017 @06:33AM
(#14236600)
Does not pay as well as Wall Street. Not sure which one is less ethical, though. Also, both provide useful services but destroy a lot of the ecosystem they operate in.
Re:Facebook Australia allowed advertisers to target teens’ e...
by raverbashing on Monday May 01, 2017 @06:39AM
(#14236635)
Probably less pressure and bureaucracy than Wall Street though
Re:Facebook Australia allowed advertisers to target teens’ e...
by user5994461 on Monday May 01, 2017 @09:49AM
(#14237414)
Finance and the internet giants both cover a wide range of pay and a wide range of bureaucracy.
The top end of both domains pay rather well and has moderate bureaucracy.
Re:Facebook Australia allowed advertisers to target teens’ e...
by ocdtrekkie on Monday May 01, 2017 @09:55AM
(#14237448)
Depends where you're at. Levandowski got paid $120 million, IIRC? Obviously an edge case, but it's hard to imagine an engineer in Wall Street making that much.
(And he may never work again after this scandal runs through... but he also probably will never truly need to work again anyways.)