News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on OOP vs. FP. Parent comment

Re:OOP vs. FP by BoiledCabbage on Sunday April 30, 2017 @10:43PM (#14235271)
Yes, but in common discussion, noone when talking about OOP is referring to inheritence-less OOP. No common programming language uses it, few to no programmers practice it. OOP/w inheritance is the default item being discussed.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:OOP vs. FP by horrido on Sunday April 30, 2017 @11:40PM (#14235438)
And why is "common discussion" technically relevant? This is not a fault of OOP but of education.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:OOP vs. FP by BoiledCabbage on Monday May 01, 2017 @10:37PM (#14243562)
You're talking about about OOP-B, everyone here is talking about OOP-A. OOP-B isn't really a part of what's being discussed.

Anyone can bring it up, but "education" isn't relevant here. It's not what was discussed in the article, or the comments.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:OOP vs. FP by nailer on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @08:20AM (#14255043)
As neither of you, I'm talking about OOP. Nobody's limiting the discussion to composition or inheritance. Otherwise we'd be talking about how 'inheritance sucks' rather than 'OOP sucks'.
[ Parent | on HN ]