News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Linus vs C++, again by kscaldef on Friday June 11, 2010 @02:47AM (#1423064)
I was quoting Larry Wall who said that a programming language should "make easy things easy and hard things possible". (Or something close to that... the internet seems a little uncertain on his exact wording.)
Re:Linus vs C++, again by johnyzee on Friday June 11, 2010 @07:30AM (#1423504)
I usually hear it in the form of a denouncement of tools that "make easy things easier and hard things impossible". I think that perfectly describes a bad abstraction layer.
Re:Linus vs C++, again by eru on Friday June 11, 2010 @01:34PM (#1424039)
Haskell is claimed to make hard things easy, and impossible things happen. (Though, who knows, perhaps easy things will become impossible with it?)
Re:Linus vs C++, again by orblivion on Friday June 11, 2010 @04:47PM (#1424697)
Not before making easy things hard, though.
Re:Linus vs C++, again by eru on Saturday June 12, 2010 @12:34AM (#1425548)
You get used to it. The stuff that's easier in other languages than in Haskell is mostly done by hiding distinctions.
Re:Linus vs C++, again by eru on Monday June 14, 2010 @07:02AM (#1429325)
Though not completely. Some stuff is made more complicated than necessary because of the choice of syntax. E.g. variadic function in Haskell vs Scheme. Or the the Haskell record-syntax.