Re:What i wish i knew when learning haskell
by platz on Saturday April 29, 2017 @10:41PM
(#14229921)
I did not say core.typed wasn't accepted by the Clojure community. It's great you have many examples of Clojurians extolling core.typed.
I said rejecting "core values", outright, would be met with resistance. Since Optional Typing via core.typed is a "core value" as you claim, there is no conflict. I want to be clear about what I'm claiming here.
> > Conversely, if I am a fan of static typing and compile time constraints, should I expect a warm welcome pushing those ideas in Clojure and Ruby communities?
> Absolutely.
Well, I think you're being disingenuous. After saying "Static typing simply isn't a core value for Clojure". If I claim in the Clojurians slack the value of what we agree is not a core value for Clojure, namely, ahead-of-time/compile-time static typing, yes, I think that would be met with some resistance.
Also, I hope you're not thinking that in this thread I have some problem with Clojure. I'm talking about sociology, not technology.
I said rejecting "core values", outright, would be met with resistance. Since Optional Typing via core.typed is a "core value" as you claim, there is no conflict. I want to be clear about what I'm claiming here.
> > Conversely, if I am a fan of static typing and compile time constraints, should I expect a warm welcome pushing those ideas in Clojure and Ruby communities?
> Absolutely.
Well, I think you're being disingenuous. After saying "Static typing simply isn't a core value for Clojure". If I claim in the Clojurians slack the value of what we agree is not a core value for Clojure, namely, ahead-of-time/compile-time static typing, yes, I think that would be met with some resistance.
Also, I hope you're not thinking that in this thread I have some problem with Clojure. I'm talking about sociology, not technology.