News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No feigning surprise by scandox on Saturday April 29, 2017 @05:10PM (#14228765)
Well I don't think people have as much "clean" access to their own behaviour and thoughts, as is generally thought. By thinking about our thoughts, we alter them. So that's why no-one can be crystal clear about their own motivations.

I don't confess to feigning surprise in my comment. I believe it is very common, purely from observation of others - especially children and young adults.

Re:No feigning surprise by kurthr on Saturday April 29, 2017 @05:17PM (#14228799)
OK, you don't apply Bayesian priors to other's behavior based on your own internal knowledge. I'm not sure why you have much confidence in the analysis, then. See the second argument of chroma.
Re:No feigning surprise by scandox on Saturday April 29, 2017 @05:22PM (#14228827)
What's a Bayesian prior?
Re:No feigning surprise by StavrosK on Saturday April 29, 2017 @05:53PM (#14228980)
I guess they mean "how likely it is that they know something just because you know it".