Gender and verbs across 100K stories: a tidy analysis

Re:Gender and verbs across 100K stories: a tidy analysis by sctb on Friday April 28, 2017 @03:01PM (#14222111)

> ... were too eager to draw sweeping conclusions based on a, while promising if fine tuned, shotgun methodology to classify gender

I'm not sure exactly what this means, but you didn't say this—you said something deliberately inflammatory on an already controversial topic. We need commenters not to do that here because it sparks tedious flamewars by which our intellectual curiosity (the reason this site exists) is decidedly unsatisfied.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Gender and verbs across 100K stories: a tidy analysis by godmodus on Friday April 28, 2017 @03:56PM (#14222578)

I merely referenced a meme to convey my opinion, which is repeated in the comment itself. We have to be careful not to turn hn into an ivory tower.

I do get you, but take it witha grain of sault. The real danger to our discourse is opinion Manipulation and echo chambers.

[ Parent | on HN ]