News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Just Say No by rwmj on Friday April 28, 2017 @10:37AM (#14219690)
Weirdly I find that it's not illegal in the UK. The illegal thing is not disclosing it when you sell the car on (straightforward fraud).

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/car-news/consumer-news/88547/ca...

Re:Just Say No by adrianN on Friday April 28, 2017 @10:42AM (#14219728)
That sounds ok to me. It's your car, you should be able to set the odometer to whatever you want. Using that ability to defraud people of their money is what should be illegal.
Re:Just Say No by lisper on Friday April 28, 2017 @10:45AM (#14219757)
That's how it is in the U.S. (at least in California). When you sell a car you have to write down the odometer reading on the paperwork and indicate whether or not it is accurate to the best of your knowledge. But actually changing the reading is not illegal. It makes sense: the reading could be off due to mechanical failure.
Re:Just Say No by LyndsySimon on Friday April 28, 2017 @10:56AM (#14219851)
Makes sense.

I drive a Jeep, and the speedometer on it is off by 12% due to the larger-than-stock tires that are on it. The odometer reads 160k, but I would assume that it was 170-180k on it in reality, depending on when the tires were originally installed.

Re:Just Say No by waterphone on Friday April 28, 2017 @11:01AM (#14219903)
Unless you've simply decided this isn't important to you, changing the speedometer gear on a Jeep to an appropriate size for your tires is generally a several minute job with minimal tools.
Re:Just Say No by lisper on Friday April 28, 2017 @11:40AM (#14220300)
On the other hand, what one really should be caring about is not the mileage per se, but how many cycles are on the drive train. The distance the chassis has moved doesn't really matter.
Re:Just Say No by markrages on Friday April 28, 2017 @02:13PM (#14221748)
But each cycle represents more wear with the larger tires, since the drivetrain torque is higher. You can't cheat physics.
Re:Just Say No by adrianN on Friday April 28, 2017 @02:57PM (#14222081)
It's probably not a linear relationship though.
Re:Just Say No by waterphone on Friday April 28, 2017 @12:52PM (#14221006)
Correct—but having a functioning speedometer is generally useful.
Re:Just Say No by waterphone on Friday April 28, 2017 @10:59AM (#14219885)
Also, older vehicles have shorter odometers that roll over back to zero automatically.
Re:Just Say No by praptak on Friday April 28, 2017 @10:54AM (#14219832)
I believe my insurance company took the odometer reading into account when calculating the rate for next year, so I wouldn't even have to sell the car to turn clocking into fraud.
Re:Just Say No by sambe on Friday April 28, 2017 @12:20PM (#14220714)
The UK is (for now) part of the EU. If we believe the original article that it's illegal in the EU, then it's illegal in the UK (this is likely to be the case even after Brexit, judging by what is being said about the legal process). That doesn't always mean that action is taken, unfortunately. I also don't immediately find any EU laws about it (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getAllAnswers.do?referen... suggests that there wasn't any in 2011 and the new road-worthiness harmonisation only made it easier to detect)
Re:Just Say No by rwmj on Friday April 28, 2017 @05:06PM (#14223047)
Apparently the law's going to be changed in 2018.

Good job we'll finally be able to throw off the shackles of EU laws and have fraudsters sell us hooky cars. [Is this right?]