News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Rust 1.17. Parent comment

Re:Rust 1.17 by proyb2 on Thursday April 27, 2017 @09:30PM (#14216268)
In the previous discussion on Rust Fireflowers https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13272474

One of the successful stories with Rust I read https://users.rust-lang.org/t/success-story-new-rustacean-be...

In other blog, there are benchmarks that Go outperform Rust but I believe the Rust code didn't use buffer read. http://126kr.com/article/5cikidl5bhe

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rust 1.17 by dbaupp on Thursday April 27, 2017 @10:20PM (#14216463)
The code there is reading into a buffer; I'm guessing optimisations weren't turned on.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rust 1.17 by proyb2 on Friday April 28, 2017 @07:17AM (#14218471)
Good to know, indeed, the optimization wasn't turned on, it appeared to come close to Go timing. I have tweeted him.
[ Parent | on HN ]