Linus vs C++, again

Re:Linus vs C++, again by jrockway on Thursday June 10, 2010 @04:43PM (#1421591)

Actually, you refute his point. If they were actual classes instead of ad-hoc vtables, the flow would be clear.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Linus vs C++, again by bnoordhuis on Thursday June 10, 2010 @04:53PM (#1421631)

No, he didn't. A call to ipv4_recv() is obvious, a call to impl->recv() less so.

[ Parent | on HN ]

[deleted]

Re:Linus vs C++, again by cakeface on Thursday June 10, 2010 @05:34PM (#1421802)

This post makes me wish that I had enough karma to downvote.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Linus vs C++, again by KirinDave on Thursday June 10, 2010 @07:06PM (#1422097)

You can save your spiteful single clicks. That post sinks its own ship plenty well.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Linus vs C++, again by alnayyir on Thursday June 10, 2010 @11:52PM (#1422712)

It got deleted, a little context so that I understand?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Linus vs C++, again by tree_of_item on Friday June 11, 2010 @02:07PM (#1424150)

I was under the impression things were easier to understand without context.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Linus vs C++, again by alnayyir on Monday June 14, 2010 @02:15AM (#1429039)

Maybe if you find it easier to work with figments of your own imagination rather than operating on actual data, perhaps.

[ Parent | on HN ]