> FDA would prefer I spend hundreds of dollars a year on drugs.
Would you elaborate on this? It leads me to think that the FDA is either recommending against you handling your gout as you see fit through diet, or strongly encouraging you to use the medication you'd rather not spend money on. The FDA may approve drugs for specific treatments, but that doesn't mean you have to use them, does it?
I think it's the pharmaceutical industry that would prefer you give them money, not the FDA which is government funded.
Admittedly some in the FDA are probably protecting the pharma industry.
Re:A critique of trends in tech
by jessaustin on Thursday April 27, 2017 @10:34PM
(#14216505)
"More than a quarter of the Food and Drug Administration employees who approved cancer and hematology drugs from 2001 through 2010 left the agency and now work or consult for pharmaceutical companies..." [0]
Of course some naive person might demand some sort of smoking-gun admission of collusion or whatever...
[0] http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/09/28/49569455...
I have gout, which is well controlled by not eating too much meat at a sitting and occasional "doses" of tart cherry juice. FDA would prefer I spend hundreds of dollars a year on drugs. I'm not sure what to recommend for your hysterics, however.