The secret lives of Google raters

Re:The secret lives of Google raters by ksk on Thursday April 27, 2017 @12:23PM (#14212711)

I'm no fan of Google, but I don't agree with the idea that Google is obligated to have them as employees. If anything, it just shows the BS of the whole AI narrative that a lot of startups (also non startups like MS/FB/Google) have been trying to push.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The secret lives of Google raters by sunshiney on Thursday April 27, 2017 @04:27PM (#14214412)

If you study how Leapforce interacts with or what they require of their subcontractors and compare to the Labor & Industry definition of business owner/independent contractor, you would see that they are abusing the definition. Leapforce subcontractors are employees.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The secret lives of Google raters by ksk on Thursday April 27, 2017 @11:19PM (#14216659)

I agree that Leapforce is responsible, I just don't get how Google is as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]