Yes. Anyone who is interested in making changes to their own website may very well be interested in how changes to the largest website in the world are received by the public.

I can understand being excited about a cool pacman game being playable on the google homepage, or something that warrants a discussion on A/B testing, or for that matter, Google adding customizable backgrounds. But saying "Hey, guys, look! Google silently rolled back a blooper!"? Come on.

This minimalistic design has long been a cornerstone of Google's brand. That they are changing this (and why) is noteworthy to anybody who cares about design on the Internet.

If you don't like the story, you can skip over it to the next one. :)

You misunderstood my comment: I said I actually find the addition of wallpapers interesting. My rant is about linking to the good old page after the fact as if that's noteworthy. I mean, Google was going to remove the wallpaper at the end of the day just like they do with their logo art anyways.

Yeah, I think that they added this, faced a backlash, flubbed the rollout, and then did an about-face the next day is noteable for various reasons.

Largest website in the world? I wonder how many people actually go to the google page to search. I never do. I always use the browsers search box.

I personally never do, but was chatting to my wife today and heard that most of her office had set google.com as their browser's home page. So they definitely see/notice changes like this.

I think that this situation is more common than most readers here like to think...

Well, the search results pages are technically part of the site too.