News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An analysis of the Nomx secure communications device by JasuM on Thursday April 27, 2017 @06:04AM (#14210368)
Its port 26 enforces TLS though.
Re:An analysis of the Nomx secure communications device by tankenmate on Thursday April 27, 2017 @07:57AM (#14210778)
But doesn't bother to check if the certs (local and remote server) have been signed by a trusted authority. Nor does it attempt to pin these certs.

It provides encryption, but no authentication nor authorisation. In short an ever so slight improvement over normal SMTP.

Re:An analysis of the Nomx secure communications device by i336_ on Thursday April 27, 2017 @08:17AM (#14210881)
It's actively ten thousand times worse than that. From the article:

> The device uses self-signed certs throughout and they aren't even device specific. It's using the default ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem and ssl-cert-snakeoil.key in the Postfix config.