News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Myth of a Superhuman AI by TheOtherHobbes on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @09:52PM (#14208598)
But if the AI is fast enough, the project will be late much more quickly.

Perhaps more relevantly, I think there's a more basic questionable assumption - the idea that Church-Turing is the best computational basis for AI.

I strongly suspect this is not true - because even after all this time, our best abstract models of computation are still extremely brittle and fragile.

In a hand-wavey sense, as soon as you start allowing for arbitrary inputs and context awareness, you're no longer dealing with a simple Turing architecture but with something else entirely.

Re:The Myth of a Superhuman AI by adrianN on Thursday April 27, 2017 @03:44AM (#14209872)
The TMs you hear about in your undergrad studies are not even good models for the webserver that served you this comment. Church-Turing is about computing functions over the natural numbers. You can (and usually do) have a Turing complete model of computation in which you can't program Tetris.