News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be by extrapickles on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @07:11PM (#14207852)
You can do things with the excess power that otherwise would be un-economical to do during a cloudy day. Things like smelting aluminum, desalinating water, etc take massive amounts of power.
Re:Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be by TheSpiceIsLife on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @10:57PM (#14208847)
You can't just do those things when the weather is good.

Not without huge tax breaks to incentivise load following, because intermittent production of large scale industrial processes is hard and not cheap.

Re:Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be by extrapickles on Thursday April 27, 2017 @04:38AM (#14210071)
They already do this without any gov intervention. The local steel recycling plant only operates when power is cheap. While they do need some advance notice to make sure they have enough people to run, they probably can get a good enough idea from a weather forecast (power here is mostly hydro with a dollop of wind and fossil).

Some processes are better fits than others. If you have 2-5x extra capacity that is sold cheap on sunny days, someone will figure out how to use it.

Re:Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be by TheSpiceIsLife on Thursday April 27, 2017 @03:48PM (#14214164)
Do we have any numbers on what it means that they run only when the power is cheap?

Does that mean they can operate in 4hr windows? Or do they run have to run the furnace for a minimum period? A large quantity of steel takes a large amount of energy to melt.

Re:Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be by maxerickson on Thursday April 27, 2017 @03:56PM (#14214208)
Interesting question. Brief research says the cycle time is ~1 hour (or less):

http://www.steel.org/making-steel/how-its-made/processes/pro...

It could also be a plant for shredding scrap, where I guess it wouldn't be a time issue so much (and if it doesn't have the material inflows to run full time, timing cheap power would make sense).

Re:Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be by TheSpiceIsLife on Friday April 28, 2017 @12:19AM (#14216839)
Thanks for the link, looks pretty detailed. I work in steel fabrication, so it'll make interesting reading for me.