News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Myth of a Superhuman AI by zeeveener on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @05:50PM (#14207367)
Would it not appear as though it was more intelligent simply based on the speed at which it makes decisions?

The Actual Intelligence may be the same (or a little higher) considering the Average Intelligence, but the effect the higher speed would likely be a measurable difference.

Re:The Myth of a Superhuman AI by aetherson on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @06:42PM (#14207695)
Yes, that's what I'm saying. If you can make an AI that's roughly human IQ (even like 80 IQ), but thinks 100x faster than a human, then that's something very much like, if not identical to, "a superhuman AI."

So when you say, "Here's how we'll get superhuman AI: We'll network together bunches of 80 IQ AI's that think 100x faster than a human," it's kind of assuming its own solution.

Re:The Myth of a Superhuman AI by canes123456 on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @11:37PM (#14209010)
The 100x faster scenario is not really clear to me. Computers already "think" orders of magnitude faster for some things and orders of magnitude slower in other things. I am not sure this will be all that much more useful than the status quo. Unless they modeling a human brain than I see 100x faster being a useful thing to measure. Otherwise, I don't see speed increases being all that critical to making a superhuman AI.

I think networks of AI can become super powerful even without being nearly as smart as individual humans. AI will only need to approach certain aspects of humans IQ. It can still be much dumb than us in most ways. Most of human progress has been build up because of vague interactions and feedback loops via markets, religions, and nations.

Re:The Myth of a Superhuman AI by aetherson on Thursday April 27, 2017 @12:53PM (#14212964)
You said that the AIs would be able to "communicate and interact" much faster than humans. If they can't think much faster than humans, then they can't communicate and interact (meaningfully) much faster than humans.
Re:The Myth of a Superhuman AI by canes123456 on Monday May 01, 2017 @11:05PM (#14243657)
You can think much faster than you can express yourself. You can express yourself much faster than most people can understand you. You can only have a back and forth communication with a tiny number of people at once.
Re:The Myth of a Superhuman AI by rtx on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @07:12PM (#14207854)
Why would you network them? Just add more ram.
Re:The Myth of a Superhuman AI by aetherson on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @07:16PM (#14207883)
Ask the guy who came up with this scenario. But, obviously, we do at some point find it easier to set up side-by-side computers with (relatively) high-latency connections (like, say, ethernet) than to try to put more computing resources together with low-latency connections (like motherboard busses), for physical reasons.
Re:The Myth of a Superhuman AI by rtx on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @07:24PM (#14207923)
Reminds me of the story about the galaxy spanning AI in the Dune series. With a latency of 10000 light years between it's various instances.
Re:The Myth of a Superhuman AI by EGreg on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @09:16PM (#14208441)
How did they physically get the machines so far apart in the first place? No wormholes??
Re:The Myth of a Superhuman AI by rtx on Thursday April 27, 2017 @02:00AM (#14209500)
They had FTL capable ships. The AI used to sync updates using that.
Re:The Myth of a Superhuman AI by canes123456 on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @11:43PM (#14209026)
Same reason why culture matters more than individual IQ. Most of human progress is cause because there are many people learn from each other and making millions of tiny improvements over time.