News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be by sbierwagen on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @04:58PM (#14206936)
https://dothemath.ucsd.edu/2012/03/space-based-solar-power/

>At this level, our 3.6 km diameter collecting area would generate about 40 GWh of energy in a day, at an assumed reception/conversion efficiency of 70%. By comparison, a flat array of 15%-efficient PV panels occupying the same area in the Mojave Desert would generate about a fourth as much energy averaged over the year. So these beaming hotspots are not terribly more concentrated than what the sunlight provides already. Again, I find myself scratching my head as to why we should go to so much trouble.

Re:Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be by ChuckMcM on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @05:32PM (#14207200)
Grid delivery. You cannot easily move power from the desert into urban centers.
Re:Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be by sbierwagen on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @07:20PM (#14207901)
Well, you sure can't point the power delivery beam at downtown LA either.

And the footprint of the rectenna array is enormous-- Tom assumes a 100GHz transmit antenna 30m wide, which means the downlink antenna has to be 3.6km wide! And this is the minor axis-- the solar array has to be geosynchronous orbit, which means any receiving antenna not on the equator has be an ellipse.