News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be by supergarfield on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @02:56PM (#14205895)
I don't think the main problem here is random terrorists cutting power to Europe by blowing up a power line tower. The real problem is that nation states that control the Sahara haven't proven to be stable (Syria, Egypt), or don't always have great relationships with Europe (Algeria in the 90s).

As to points 4 and 5, although storage and some backup capacity is reasonably feasible, this would mean that Europe could very well be forced to go to war in short order to get their full power supply back if a rogue organization gained power in North Africa.

Re:Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be by chris1993 on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @07:00PM (#14207798)
It might motivate Europe to improve relations with the region
Re:Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be by petre on Sunday April 30, 2017 @01:06AM (#14230242)
We'll be better off building nuclear reactors, thank you. The social and political challenges are much lower and so are the risks.
Re:Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be by supergarfield on Thursday April 27, 2017 @09:03AM (#14211119)
(I obviously meant Libya, not Syria)