Re:Show HN: Kobble – Notes app that saves directly to GitHub
by mikejmoffitt on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @02:13PM
(#14205509)
YouTube users do not organize videos into channels. Channels are delivery mechanisms. Users organize them with Playlists, which is intuitive for the content.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Kobble – Notes app that saves directly to GitHub
by kobble on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @02:17PM
(#14205548)
Fair enough. We merged the channel/playlist concept.
Re:Show HN: Kobble – Notes app that saves directly to GitHub
by ohyeshedid on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @03:31PM
(#14206199)
..but, but, it doesn't really apply to the expectations of a note app. You're a light text editor that cloud saves to Github; why are you trying to push a new vernacular that doesn't logically apply here?
I don't manage projects with a notes app. I don't create tracks with a notes app. I don't create channels with a notes app. I don't create playlists with a notes app.
It's pretty and functional; play to your strengths instead of trying to create new brand vernacular.
Re:Show HN: Kobble – Notes app that saves directly to GitHub
by kobble on Thursday April 27, 2017 @12:23PM
(#14212710)
We are honing our marketing message. Kobble is much more than just a notes app. It's also a content sharing platform. That's why some of the names were chosen. I think 'track' is causing the most confusion. It's basically a tree or folder structure.
Re:Show HN: Kobble – Notes app that saves directly to GitHub
by devopsproject on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @04:14PM
(#14206542)
folders and pages would have been better.
model it after something in the real world before you appropriate words from another paradigm
Re:Show HN: Kobble – Notes app that saves directly to GitHub
by killjoywashere on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @03:45PM
(#14206311)
how about "notebook"?