Re:A vigilante trying to improve IoT security
by norea-armozel on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @01:48PM
(#14205266)
Okay but why does a dialysis machine need to be on the internet? Even if it's done to forward reports regarding the usage of the machine that can be done in a daily dump when you swap it out I'm guessing, right? So, it doesn't need to be an always-on device with respect to its NIC. Plus, there's no benefit to the user to have their life giving machinery be online. It's just another thing to overcharge the hospital for all in the false name of productivity.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A vigilante trying to improve IoT security
by digi_owl on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @02:04PM
(#14205419)
It is not on the net, but it is on a LAN that has a firewall somewhere that is leaky.
This because it is cheaper in the short run to string a single physical network and then use vlans etc to attempt to keep medical stuff from talking to accounting or the visitors WiFi.
This so a single overworked nurse can monitor a number of patients from a bank of monitors hooked to a thin client near the ward entrance.
Re:A vigilante trying to improve IoT security
by norea-armozel on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @03:29PM
(#14206184)
Then it seems to me that more nurses and less dependence on fragile technology is a better option. Costs can be economized by many other methods. Labor is something that should be the last thing to pare down.
Re:A vigilante trying to improve IoT security
by digi_owl on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @03:44PM
(#14206302)
Technology, done right, can be more reliable than humans.
But in this instance the weighting is one done by beancounters looking at salaries as an ongoing expense, while tech is an investment that pays itself back the longer it can be used without further expences.