Re:A vigilante trying to improve IoT security
by benchaney on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @01:58PM
(#14205356)
I disagree. We know that the probability of it happening again is very high, seeing as it has already happened multiple times, and no serious action has been taken to improve the situation. If we were speculating about a theoretical risk, I would agree with you.
Re:A vigilante trying to improve IoT security
by cryptarch on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @01:57PM
(#14205352)
I think the issue is less the chance of the lawnmower going wild by itself (because screw that, I don't care how small the chance is, it's not acceptable), and more the chance of the lawnmower exploding, taking out your eye when you trigger it's failure it yourself.
As in, "the chance of getting hacked" < "the chance of the vigilante creating dangerous situations".
The answer falls into an area that's somewhat unknowable with current information, which is why I can't fault either behavior.