Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be

Re:Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be by mseebach on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @12:35PM (#14204556)

> the effort of disrupting which would be unavailable to all but state agents

It's a good thing then that there is a long history of all state agents in northern Africa maintaining friendly and stable relations with European governments.

(Yes, said Europeans also carry a great deal of responsibility for this situation, but that doesn't make the situation any more tractable).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be by semi-extrinsic on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @04:20PM (#14206607)

Almost like the natural gas pipelines that come into Europe from our best buddy Vlad.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be by thatcat on Saturday April 29, 2017 @09:38AM (#14226533)

Wouldn't creating a partnership then help to stabilize that relationship?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Fusion reactors: Not what they’re cracked up to be by petre on Sunday April 30, 2017 @01:01AM (#14230227)

Partnerships with whom? Several different warring tribes that want to gain control over the other or achieve independence? Morocco or Jordan maybe, the rest of them most likely not.

[ Parent | on HN ]