News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon Echo Look by vishbar on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @11:59AM (#14204152)
There's a much more immediately practical reason to keep it in-firewall as well: if the utility company accidentally cuts a fiber line outside my house, I don't want to be suddenly unable to turn off my hallway light.
Re:Amazon Echo Look by maxerickson on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @12:22PM (#14204416)
Maybe building codes could spec that home automation devices must have local controls.

The companies aren't going to do it without regulation.

Re:Amazon Echo Look by twothamendment on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @04:42PM (#14206785)
Wait, so now building codes are going to get involved with what I run in my house after it is built and inspected? That doesn't sound like building codes. If anything, regulation from the FCC or someone else would be more uh, fitting.
Re:Amazon Echo Look by maxerickson on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @07:43PM (#14208010)
Sure, I was thinking of things like lights supporting local control. I guess I'd try to write it so that a phone app talking to the light counted as passing the rule, as long as it worked without an internet connection.

I don't see how it is a problem for simple rules like "Installed lights must always be controllable from inside the premises" to be code.

Re:Amazon Echo Look by tomc1985 on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @01:52PM (#14205309)
Or maybe people stop building all this shit in the cloud?
Re:Amazon Echo Look by maxerickson on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @02:10PM (#14205476)
Part of my argument there is that it isn't going to happen without regulation.