News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In Bay Area, six-figure salaries are “low income” by lisper on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @12:29PM (#14195126)
Once upon a time a family of four would live in a 1200 square foot house and own one car and one television, would rarely travel, rarely go out to eat. That kind of life style can still be sustained even in the Bay area on $100k/yr.
Re:In Bay Area, six-figure salaries are “low income” by throwa38282 on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @12:37PM (#14195250)
Once upon a time, the woman stayed at home and didn't need a second car.

Televisions were prohibitively priced as to make one even a stretch.

And, travel was prohibitively priced so that only the ultra-rich could afford planes. When cars hit the scene en masse, it brought rise to car trips.

So, I guess you're saying people aren't living within their means? But they weren't necessarily then either... And boy, I sure miss all of the great stuff from the 50s.

Re:In Bay Area, six-figure salaries are “low income” by douche on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @12:56PM (#14195503)
> Televisions were prohibitively priced as to make one even a stretch.

It's just astounding how cheap televisions have become. A 32" flatscreen is like $150, and weighs ten pounds.

Re:In Bay Area, six-figure salaries are “low income” by itomato on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @02:19PM (#14196495)
Whereas content is $100/month when it used to be $0.
Re:In Bay Area, six-figure salaries are “low income” by throwa38282 on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @02:36PM (#14196667)
Broadcast TV is still free. Movies always cost a fair amount of money.

An internet connection with youtube is $30 which is WAY more variety than "back then".

Re:In Bay Area, six-figure salaries are “low income” by itomato on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @03:09PM (#14196988)
Mmm. Yeah, I get loads of value from Univision and Home Shopping Channels like HSN, QVC and the others.

Can't forget Qubo and Me.tv. Good times, for sure.

Re:In Bay Area, six-figure salaries are “low income” by throwa38282 on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @04:02PM (#14197452)
CBS, NBC, ABC, FOX, PBS

Also, I'm suspecting you're not a Spanish speaker, so I guess it's okay to discount a channel that over 10% of the US has utility for.

Cable TV is a relatively recent invention, has quickly declining subscription rates, and has always been billed as premium.

Re:In Bay Area, six-figure salaries are “low income” by geebee on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @01:14PM (#14195774)
You know, maybe not. Even in the excelsior, a 1200sf ft house that is liveable (not remodeled highly, just liveable) will run you $900k. It can go up from there easily.

It's possible, I suppose... You'd need to be a one income family at 100k, because there's no way you could cover that and child care. But yeah, a stay at home spouse and a working spouse who brought in 100k might be able to make it work south of 280.

EDIT: just realized you said Bay Area, not San Francisco. That changes things.

Re:In Bay Area, six-figure salaries are “low income” by Veelox on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @04:29PM (#14197677)
Even with your edit I would like to chime in that I got a condo in San Jose that is 3 bed, 2 bath for <500k. It isn't fancy but it is home.
Re:In Bay Area, six-figure salaries are “low income” by linkregister on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @12:52PM (#14204723)
When did you buy this condo? Surely not recently.
Re:In Bay Area, six-figure salaries are “low income” by Veelox on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @12:39PM (#14247931)
I closed in December of 2016, as I nice side affect I got a rate that was a little lower then they are now.
Re:In Bay Area, six-figure salaries are “low income” by jostmey on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @01:17PM (#14195810)
Great point. Let's regress backwards. San Francisco's housing crises and living cost is self inflicted by limiting supply.