Re:Alphabet's Self-Driving Cars to Get Their First Real Riders
by csours on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @10:50AM
(#14194001)
By describing and marketing driver assistance technology as self-driving technology.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Alphabet's Self-Driving Cars to Get Their First Real Riders
by TheAnimus on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @11:21AM
(#14194299)
Which is kind of funny, because every pilot knows the limitation of each kind of autopilot. I think a lot of it is public expectation of that kind of name.
Re:Alphabet's Self-Driving Cars to Get Their First Real Riders
by csours on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @11:33AM
(#14194425)
Right, and if drivers read ALL of the fine print of Tesla Autopilot, they would have been informed of the limitations of that system as well.
The problem comes when the Large Print promises things that the system does not do.
Another problem came from the implementation of the system where Tesla did not verify that the driver maintains hands on the wheel.
Re:Alphabet's Self-Driving Cars to Get Their First Real Riders
by marvin on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @12:05PM
(#14194810)
The large print says to keep your hands on the steering wheel and be prepared for the autopilot to fail or disengage at any time. I don't see how this is promising a self-driving car?
Re:Alphabet's Self-Driving Cars to Get Their First Real Riders
by csours on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @12:32PM
(#14195175)
It does now, but in previous versions it did not.
Re:Alphabet's Self-Driving Cars to Get Their First Real Riders
by legolas2412 on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @02:59PM
(#14196884)
And even now, the popular perception is that Tesla is autonomous, and it is only the regulations holding them back.