Re:Software Developers after 40, 50 and 60 Who're Still Coding
by cyrux004 on Monday April 24, 2017 @06:03PM
(#14188799)
At Microsoft, annual compensation for entry level hire is around 130k (W2 box #2) where as for the principal engineer that figure is atleast 350k
Re:Software Developers after 40, 50 and 60 Who're Still Coding
by notacoward on Monday April 24, 2017 @06:58PM
(#14189210)
So less than 3x compared to entry level, probably less than 2x compared to someone with 5-7 years.
Re:Software Developers after 40, 50 and 60 Who're Still Coding
by aanm1988 on Monday April 24, 2017 @07:37PM
(#14189455)
Principal isn't a level most people reach, and has better salary.
Re:Software Developers after 40, 50 and 60 Who're Still Coding
by psyc on Monday April 24, 2017 @09:10PM
(#14189976)
Jesus. When I started in '06, my total comp was 82k. My last year, 2010, my total comp was $115k. I managed to be both too late and too early to that party.
Re:Software Developers after 40, 50 and 60 Who're Still Coding
by drchickensalad on Monday April 24, 2017 @08:15PM
(#14189693)
Principal is not normal.
Re:Software Developers after 40, 50 and 60 Who're Still Coding
by ryandrake on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @12:30AM
(#14190777)
Exactly. I actually left software development after about 15 years. I think my salary progression was pretty typical:
First 5 years = ridiculous year over year growth, including getting raises without having to change jobs!
Next 5 years = slow growth, generally have to change jobs in order to get a raise.
Next 5 years = flatline, cost of living increases only, IF THAT.
I don't know any other professional field that plateaus this quickly.
When you look at it from a company cost perspective, the ratios get even smaller. The fixed costs (desk, power, healthcare, etc) are pretty much the same no matter the experience level of the engineer.