Re:We Just Breached the 410 PPM Threshold for CO2
by Turing_Machine on Sunday April 23, 2017 @06:12PM
(#14180707)
Now you're just getting nasty, without any substantive response to my assertions.
Hint: that means I won.
You claimed that the ecosystem "didn't survive" the Chicxulub event because there were different organisms afterward. I pointed out that by that "definition" the ecosystem has never "survived", because it has been in a state of constant change since day one.
Rather than responding to this, you just got nasty.
I repeat: I win. Sorry.
Re:We Just Breached the 410 PPM Threshold for CO2
by snowwrestler on Monday April 24, 2017 @02:41AM
(#14182355)
I did respond: I said that you are correct that ecosystems are always changing.
The question is, what do those changes mean for individual organisms? Because that's what you and I are.
Changes to the climate and ecosystem are like changes to velocity. Whether the change is good or bad for people depends on the magnitude and direction.
I do think that your focus on who is "winning" an imaginary Internet slap fight is detracting from your understanding.
The fact that this is news to you is a clue that perhaps you know less about this subject than you think you do.