Re:The U.S. wind industry now employs more than 100K people
by _ph_ on Saturday April 22, 2017 @02:05PM
(#14173765)
I do think that dams look awesome. But of course you shouldn't build them to make the landscape look nicer. Especially today, more dams should be built, both to ensure water supply and as the ideal support for wind and solar. Dams are the cheapest form of mass energy storage - many of them can even run "reverse" and store surplus energy by pumping water up into the dam.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The U.S. wind industry now employs more than 100K people
by sedachv on Saturday April 22, 2017 @05:00PM
(#14174758)
A lot of people, including me, think the exact opposite: we should be tearing down as many existing dams as possible. Dams are extremely damaging to river ecosystems and are a huge contributor to coastline erosion and exacerbate droughts.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/11/dam-removal-nelso...
Re:The U.S. wind industry now employs more than 100K people
by _ph_ on Saturday April 22, 2017 @05:09PM
(#14174817)
One has of course to learn from the mistakes of the past when deciding where and how to plan and manage dams. But California seems to suffer alternating from floods after the snow melt and droughts in between. The current dam infrastructure is to buffer the floods and release the water at a more constant rate through the season. I cannot see how this could create droughts.
Here in Germany we traditionally have more water than we need, but recently the weather is more extreme. We get stronger rains in shorter times, leading to flooding and times with less than usual water. More dam capacity is the obvious solution to that.
Preferably, dams should not be built in the middle of a living river system, but higher up in the mountains, capturing the seasonal water. Also, where needed, small bypass rivers should be kept, allowing fish to migrate freely.
Re:The U.S. wind industry now employs more than 100K people
by sedachv on Saturday April 22, 2017 @05:22PM
(#14174880)
Dams contribute to droughts by limiting the recharge of downstream ground water levels and aquifiers.
Re:The U.S. wind industry now employs more than 100K people
by _ph_ on Saturday April 22, 2017 @05:46PM
(#14175000)
Can you explain why? Over the year they would release the same water as the river without the dam would do - just not in a peak flood but reduced to a constant flood rate.
Re:The U.S. wind industry now employs more than 100K people
by sedachv on Saturday April 22, 2017 @06:08PM
(#14175097)
Dammed rivers release less water because of increased evaporation. Another problem is riverbed deepening which lowers the groundwater table. Where the water pools up is also important - having a bunch behind a dam when former wetlands and floodplains are dry is obviously not conducive to the ecosystems in those wetlands and floodplains.
Re:The U.S. wind industry now employs more than 100K people
by _ph_ on Saturday April 22, 2017 @06:12PM
(#14175120)
Doesn't that all very heavily depend on the exact nature of the system the dam is part of? We all know of the environmental problems of the Assuan dam in Egypt. But that does not mean that properly planned dam cannot be very beneficial. One shouldn't just build a dam where it is convenient but with careful analysis first. There are plenty of places where a dam just means less cities flooded occasionally but otherwise has little eco system impact.