Re:Bonobo – A data processing toolkit for Python 3.5+
by rs86 on Saturday April 22, 2017 @12:53PM
(#14173390)
Multiprocessing or muilthreading? Why don't you market it as parallel coroutines processing? That gets me interested. Because there are dozens of frameworks with overgeneral descriptions.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bonobo – A data processing toolkit for Python 3.5+
by rdorgueil on Sunday April 23, 2017 @01:09PM
(#14179047)
Today, as a default, multithreading. But that's an implementation detail. Actually, Bonobo does not support coroutines (as in asyncio coroutines) so it would be a lie to market it this way. The plan though is to allow to use coroutines/futures in the future, for specific reasons (like long running/blocking operations where keeping output order tied to input order is of no importance). Still, there is a lot on the roadmap before this becomes a priority.
I note that I still have a lot of work explaining in simple terms what is actually bonobo, without falling in the trap of "overgeneral description".