Re:Lilium – Electric vertical take-off and landing jet
by aphextron on Friday April 21, 2017 @04:02PM
(#14168949)
>You cant dead stick a cessna in an urban environment, and current ballistic parachutes aren't that heavy.
Except a ballistic parachute does absolutely nothing for you in the scenario where > 90% of accidents happen: take off and landing. Even the most advanced BRS systems on Cirrus planes require 1000 feet AGL. There's simply no getting around the basic physics of this problem.
Re:Lilium – Electric vertical take-off and landing jet
by nickthemagicman on Friday April 21, 2017 @05:00PM
(#14169398)
Yeah but dead sticking is less effective during take off and landing as well.
Re:Lilium – Electric vertical take-off and landing jet
by falcolas on Friday April 21, 2017 @05:15PM
(#14169481)
I watched someone who wouldn't make the runway (pilot error, didn't switch the fuel tanks fully on approach) dead stick onto a perpendicular highway.
With a light plane, you can do a lot with a dead stick. They have remarkably generous glide slopes (nearish to a mile horizontal travel for every 1,000 vertical feet). Not to mention being inherently stable whether under power or not.
Re:Lilium – Electric vertical take-off and landing jet
by tristanb on Friday April 21, 2017 @04:06PM
(#14168983)
Well a 0/0 safety system seems like a solvable problem in the scheme of things. airbag + chute? Who knows.
Re:Lilium – Electric vertical take-off and landing jet
by monkmartinez on Friday April 21, 2017 @06:33PM
(#14169944)
You can't dead stick most aircraft in an urban environment. Unless you are Sully...
https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/24946/what-is-t...