News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lilium – Electric vertical take-⁠off and landing jet by tristanb on Friday April 21, 2017 @03:46PM (#14168808)
You cant dead stick a cessna in an urban environment, and current ballistic parachutes aren't that heavy.

https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/24946/what-is-t...

Re:Lilium – Electric vertical take-⁠off and landing jet by aphextron on Friday April 21, 2017 @04:02PM (#14168949)
>You cant dead stick a cessna in an urban environment, and current ballistic parachutes aren't that heavy.

Except a ballistic parachute does absolutely nothing for you in the scenario where > 90% of accidents happen: take off and landing. Even the most advanced BRS systems on Cirrus planes require 1000 feet AGL. There's simply no getting around the basic physics of this problem.

Re:Lilium – Electric vertical take-⁠off and landing jet by nickthemagicman on Friday April 21, 2017 @05:00PM (#14169398)
Yeah but dead sticking is less effective during take off and landing as well.
Re:Lilium – Electric vertical take-⁠off and landing jet by falcolas on Friday April 21, 2017 @05:15PM (#14169481)
I watched someone who wouldn't make the runway (pilot error, didn't switch the fuel tanks fully on approach) dead stick onto a perpendicular highway.

With a light plane, you can do a lot with a dead stick. They have remarkably generous glide slopes (nearish to a mile horizontal travel for every 1,000 vertical feet). Not to mention being inherently stable whether under power or not.

Re:Lilium – Electric vertical take-⁠off and landing jet by tristanb on Friday April 21, 2017 @04:06PM (#14168983)
Well a 0/0 safety system seems like a solvable problem in the scheme of things. airbag + chute? Who knows.
Re:Lilium – Electric vertical take-⁠off and landing jet by monkmartinez on Friday April 21, 2017 @06:33PM (#14169944)
You can't dead stick most aircraft in an urban environment. Unless you are Sully...