Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer
by nickpeterson on Friday April 21, 2017 @12:16PM
(#14166878)
There is a rover on Mars that had been running by itself for quite a bit and it contends with far more than a dryer.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer
by DKnoll on Friday April 21, 2017 @04:40PM
(#14169257)
I assume you don't mean Beagle 2.
A Mars rover is a bad example here because it's not an item that is, or will ever be, mass-produced.
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer
by blibble on Friday April 21, 2017 @03:27PM
(#14168598)
how much did the rover cost?
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer
by nickpeterson on Friday April 21, 2017 @04:36PM
(#14169222)
Hard to know, looking at the 600 page NASA PDF, but Google says 400 million. But that's for a object that had to be transported to mars first. I bet transporting a dishwasher to mars intact to sit and not work is a similar amount of money.
Guess I just need to start an appliance company and fail to become enlightened as to why my desire of quality and serviceability are unattainable ideals.
Incidentally, your comment on price is a weak argument, because the product doesn't even exist. Even the luxury appliances have tremendously low longevity now. So luxury at this point basically means it looks really good while it works and you can afford to buy another when it doesn't.