Re:Google plans ad-blocking feature in Chrome browser
by greenshackle2 on Friday April 21, 2017 @12:08PM
(#14166784)
Or that 'what is good for the internet' is a subset of 'what is good for Google'. Language is murky but that's a more reasonable interpretation.
This presumes complete congruence between these two sets, which is precisely what is being criticized above.
How exactly is:
" The obvious reason for them to push their own ad blocker seems most likely; it is to suck the oxygen out of the space by exploiting their privileged position as a browser maker to destroy 3rd parties that can block their ads. "
If true, good for 'the internet' in general, rather than being good for Google primarily with some related good and harm for 'the internet' ?