Analysis of the United Airlines passenger removal incident

Re:Analysis of the United Airlines passenger removal incident by danderino on Friday April 21, 2017 @12:24AM (#14163083)

>Why is being able to remove paying customers such an important right, but not getting what you pay for? Kicking out a paying customer who has committed no wrongdoing is essentially theft.

No it isn't. The customer would have to be compensated for the damages.

But you should have the right to break contracts.

>Airlines should be able to kick people off for actual good reasons, like if they're a safety threat. But "we want that seat more than you do" is not a good reason.

My guess is that the reason here was "If we dont kick you off, we have to cancel/delay another flight"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Analysis of the United Airlines passenger removal incident by mikeash on Friday April 21, 2017 @08:55AM (#14165103)

That's probably what they thought, but that reason is BS. All they had to do to avoid canceling or delaying the flight was to increase their offered compensation until someone accepted it voluntarily.

[ Parent | on HN ]