News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by awqrre on Thursday April 20, 2017 @09:15PM (#14162331)
Batteries don't last this long, why does a dryer have to? it's not all about longevity ...
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by bicubic on Thursday April 20, 2017 @09:18PM (#14162347)
What to batteries have to do with clothes dryers...? You're comparing a consumable good to a household appliance. Household appliances are expected to last 5 years. 7-10 is pretty normal.
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by awqrre on Thursday April 20, 2017 @10:50PM (#14162754)
If a dryer is not a consumable, shouldn't it last forever?

If a battery is a consumable, shouldn't it last only one charging cycle?

Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by bcook on Thursday April 20, 2017 @10:55PM (#14162771)
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by awqrre on Thursday April 20, 2017 @11:14PM (#14162834)
so according to these links, a battery that lasts 2 years is a consumable good but a fridge that last 3 years is a durable good..... I think I get it.
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by function_seven on Thursday April 20, 2017 @11:30PM (#14162901)
Batteries not lasting long is considered a limitation of our current battery technology. This limitation doesn’t currently exist for typical clothes dryers.

There’s no reason to introduce a new limitation unless the technology makes up for it in other ways. Having to replace a clothes dryer every two years would require the technology to be very good to justify such a burdensome task.

Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by tunap on Thursday April 20, 2017 @11:59PM (#14163008)
"Having to replace a clothes dryer every two years would require the technology to be very good to justify such a burdensome task."

Or, a cost cutting measure of replacing a long-lasting ball bearing assembly with a shaft rotating in a vinyl cup which wears down to metal-on-metal like mine did after 3 years. Which is the sort of accelerated deprecation the OP was alluding to. Granted, the battery metaphor isn't great as energy storage tech is far from mature.

Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by rosalinekarr on Thursday April 20, 2017 @09:19PM (#14162352)
Because dryers are expensive appliances. If they're going to make one that only lasts one tenth as long, it better cost one tenth of the price too.
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by StephenConnell on Thursday April 20, 2017 @09:34PM (#14162447)
Take operating costs into account also.
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by cmdrfred on Friday April 21, 2017 @08:18AM (#14164819)
And time lost waiting for a new one to be delivered, disposal fees...
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by awqrre on Friday April 21, 2017 @01:40PM (#14167591)
If you put it by the road someone should pick it up promptly for free (or list it for free on craigslist).
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by Arizhel on Friday April 21, 2017 @11:05AM (#14166207)
Don't forget delivery and installation fees too. They don't deliver them to your house for free.
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by awqrre on Friday April 21, 2017 @01:42PM (#14167608)
Who cares about delivery fees? it's the total cost that matters.
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by Arizhel on Friday April 21, 2017 @03:38PM (#14168708)
The delivery fee is a significant fraction of the total cost of a modern dryer in the US. Saving a little money by getting crappier dryers will likely have a larger total cost because of the delivery fees, and also the cost of your time in taking time off from work to accept delivery.
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by awqrre on Friday April 21, 2017 @04:37PM (#14169230)
that dryer costing $180 at Home Depot has free shipping, by the way... http://www.homedepot.com/p/Magic-Chef-Compact-1-5-cu-ft-Elec... .... and by the way, you are paying for shipping even if you by at the store (it is just included)
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by Arizhel on Friday April 21, 2017 @05:25PM (#14169551)
WTF? We're talking about real dryers here, not dorm-sized dryers that you can dry maybe 2 shirts in.

However, if you select the Samsung 7.5cf dryer, it also has free delivery. Of course, this is built into the price, and $550 for an appliance isn't pocket change.

Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by awqrre on Friday April 21, 2017 @09:20PM (#14170627)
here is a pocket change dryer that is slightly larger: http://www.homedepot.com/p/Amana-6-5-cu-ft-Electric-Dryer-in... and of course it also has free shipping.
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by awqrre on Thursday April 20, 2017 @10:07PM (#14162603)
How much are these new dryers? I didn't see the cost.

also, where did they state the longevity?

Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by DanBC on Thursday April 20, 2017 @09:40PM (#14162478)
This device is supposed to be eco-friendlier than a hot air dryer.

The benefit reduces if you have a consumable component that needs changing, especially with the amount of e-waste that goes to landfill.

Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by awqrre on Thursday April 20, 2017 @10:51PM (#14162760)
eco friendly? right... they are only trying to get the cost down for the consumer.
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by majormajor on Thursday April 20, 2017 @11:25PM (#14162880)
Arranging large appliance delivery and disposal is a pain in the ass when you've got full time jobs to deal with. Don't want to do that any more than needed.
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by ergothus on Thursday April 20, 2017 @09:21PM (#14162369)
Batteries are also (relatively) cheap and easy to replace.

If my dryer was $50-$200 and could be carried in one hand, I'd be (grumpily) okay with it only lasting 2 years.

Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by arthulia on Thursday April 20, 2017 @09:33PM (#14162436)
Must every appliance become "disposable"?
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by ergothus on Thursday April 20, 2017 @10:35PM (#14162708)
No - I'd really love it if they didn't become disposable. Sustainability, however, isn't why people have different expectations of batteries vs dryers. I didn't mean to imply a cheap, portable, but flimsy dryer would be a good thing.
Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by awqrre on Thursday April 20, 2017 @10:06PM (#14162595)
How much does it cost for you to get an iphone battery replaced by Apple ($79)? a basic dryer costs $180 at home depot...

http://www.homedepot.com/p/Magic-Chef-Compact-1-5-cu-ft-Elec...

Re:Ultra-low-energy consumption ultrasonic clothes dryer by tempestn on Friday April 21, 2017 @03:45AM (#14163759)
Do you own a dryer? If so, would you want to go out and replace it every two years?