Re:Planet enlists machine learning experts to parse Amazon b...
by foota on Thursday April 20, 2017 @08:22PM
(#14162082)
I wonder if we could come up with some sort of fast growing plant that we could then use as a replacement for sand as a filler. This would reduce the sand crisis and capture carbon, if it's possible.
Re:Planet enlists machine learning experts to parse Amazon b...
by BurningFrog on Thursday April 20, 2017 @08:44PM
(#14162187)
There is a sand crisis too?
Is it the one caused by dams?
Re:Planet enlists machine learning experts to parse Amazon b...
by DanBC on Thursday April 20, 2017 @08:51PM
(#14162213)
Between 2011 and 2015 China poured more concrete than the US did in the entire 20th century.
Sand is one component of most concrete.
https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/feb/27/sand-mining-g...
The Amazon probably doesn't absorb any net amount of carbon, unless it's growing.
Let's demystify this: The carbon trapped in the Amazon is the plants. When plants consume CO₂, the C part becomes the plant. In a forest in equilibrium, growing plants do capture carbon from the air, but rotting dead plants release an equal amount.
So when you chop down a forest, and for the sake of example burn all the plants, you're releasing a large one-time amount of CO₂, but then the whole damage is done. And if you then leave the area alone, the forest will regenerate over the next 50-100 years, reabsorb the same amount of CO₂.
If you chop down the forest and build lasting structures from the wood, you're actually removing net CO₂!