Re:Proposal to start a new implementation of Thunderbird bas...
by _eht on Thursday April 20, 2017 @02:59PM
(#14159726)
It's an incredible product as-is, but I feel like they are stuck between a rock and a hard place with moving forward and forecasting beyond the immediate future.
I don't see why a new implementation couldn't maintain the current UI/native feel outside of poor decision making.
I could see it as a net positive, with cleaner easier to maintain code base built on more recent tech that is more accommodating to younger developers.
If they could pull off what Atom.io/Github did for the old ingrained IDE world in a mail client, that would be incredible, IMO.
Re:Proposal to start a new implementation of Thunderbird bas...
by forgotpwtomain on Thursday April 20, 2017 @03:52PM
(#14160223)
> If they could pull off what Atom.io/Github did for the old ingrained IDE world in a mail client, that would be incredible, IMO.
You mean give hipster programmers an editor where one can literally see the delay between typing and something appearing on the screen?
[dead]
Re:Proposal to start a new implementation of Thunderbird bas...
by sctb on Friday April 21, 2017 @05:51PM
(#14169708)
We don't personally attack other users like this here.
Not only that, but making one based on web technologies that moves away from the native look and feel it currently has would truly be a loss in my opinion. I'd probably give Claws Mail and alpine another go, maybe even desktop outlook before I'd go to something Electron-esque. I already have enough shitty electron apps - I'm currently dealing with a really weird font rendering issue arising from Electron use in VS Code.