Re:Analysis of the United Airlines passenger removal incident
by compsciphd on Friday April 21, 2017 @05:33AM
(#14164145)
the law can be that overbooking is allowed but airlines also cant involuntary boot anyone. They have to incentivize someone to get off. I'm sure if they went up to $2k in cash someone would have taken them up on the offer and just ubered to ($400ish if I remember what my check showed me) to their destination. For me, $800 (even cash) wouldn't have been sufficient for me to convince me to uber to my destination, even if I wouldn't have lost money on the transaction.
i.e. airlines are only allowed to purposefully overbook due to DOT rules, the same rules provide what I perceive as a perverse incentive when it comes to encouraging involuntary bumping.
Re:Analysis of the United Airlines passenger removal incident
by rhino369 on Friday April 21, 2017 @11:38AM
(#14166496)
The part you are missing is that airlines don't need a law that lets them overbook. They absolutely can involuntary boot anyone for any reason (other than discriminatory reasons that are otherwise illegal). Booting a person would be a breach of contract, but breaches of contracts aren't illegal.
Hell, they could update their contact and then it wouldn't even be a breach of a contract.
The law was written to reign in their behavior. Without it, they have a lot more freedom.
Without the law, United wouldn't even have to pay 4x. The remedies for regular breach of contract aren't very good.