News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Analysis of the United Airlines passenger removal incident by diminoten on Thursday April 20, 2017 @04:34AM (#14154913)
I'm not worried, because the incidents aren't there to support any concern. Flying is safe if a poorly paid pilot is flying the plane, too.

It seems like flying commercial flights has a "good enough" bar that the US government does a good job of making sure everyone who operates flights is over.

Re:Analysis of the United Airlines passenger removal incident by chinathrow on Thursday April 20, 2017 @04:46AM (#14154980)
One such incident was Buffallo.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/14/nyregion/14pilot.html?_r=0

"Members of the board said that the crew of the twin-engine turboprop that crashed, killing all 49 people on board and one on the ground, was set up for fatigue and inattention before they even took off, partly because of the structure of the commuter airline business. "

Re:Analysis of the United Airlines passenger removal incident by dingaling on Thursday April 20, 2017 @05:40AM (#14155222)
But that wasn't related to their remuneration, rather the structure of the commuter airline business. The copilot was fatigued by living in Seattle but working in Newark for a paltry $24k. Paying her more wouldn't have helped, in fact it might have encouraged more new pilots to try the same.

On the contrary side in Ireland last month we had two experienced pilots, each earning > 120k Euros, inadvertently and fatally fly a Coastguard helicopter into a rock at night. Accidents happen regardless of pay grade.

Re:Analysis of the United Airlines passenger removal incident by whazor on Thursday April 20, 2017 @06:51AM (#14155570)
Still, having depressed colleagues around you does not help with a persons well-being. It helps to have a healthy working environment with nice and permanent flight attendees. They could notice when a pilot gets depressed before something bad happens.
Re:Analysis of the United Airlines passenger removal incident by chinathrow on Thursday April 20, 2017 @05:45AM (#14155256)
Paying more could help relocate and live in a comfortable distance to where you are based as a pilot.

Renumeration is part of the structure.

Re:Analysis of the United Airlines passenger removal incident by rollingRelease on Thursday April 20, 2017 @05:56AM (#14155306)
But she didn't have to take that job.

No one can account for the fact that someone from Seattle didn't have the resources to take on the job she desperately fought for.

You know what I wanna be? A movie star!

Pay me more than other entry level movie stars because I can't afford to become one on my own, please. I don't want to work at the Starbucks down the street. I want to move to Hollywood, but can't afford it, so pay me more money now to make me the star I know I am going to become once I have the money.

Re:Analysis of the United Airlines passenger removal incident by diminoten on Thursday April 20, 2017 @12:47PM (#14158351)
While I understand the power of anecdotes, and I'm sure you could continue to push our availability heuristic into overdrive, the fact is that air travel in the US is incredibly safe, even with current practices related to pilot pay and treatment.
Re:Analysis of the United Airlines passenger removal incident by chinathrow on Friday April 21, 2017 @03:42AM (#14163744)
I haven't said anything that air travel is not incredibly safe - but I am sure it could be _even_ more safer with human working conditions for the whole crew.