News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reasons blog posts can be of higher scientific quality th... by IanCal on Monday April 17, 2017 @05:00AM (#14129914)
I'm still highly concerned about the loss of these things. I very regularly follow links to code that's just gone. The code for research definitely should not only exist in a related of post link.

Archiving, for me, is a requirement if you think it should be used over more than a year or so.

Re:Reasons blog posts can be of higher scientific quality th... by steventhedev on Monday April 17, 2017 @05:37AM (#14130004)
Obviously, having a professional librarian working on archiving data, code, and articles is ideal. However, I've found that the public facing side of journals experience bit rot even faster than most of the older blogs. Of course, there are exceptions, and even the most public figures can decide to delete everything, code included (e.g. _why)

Gwern has tackled link rot[0] in an exhaustive way, and may give you a starting point from where to continue.

[0]: https://www.gwern.net/Archiving%20URLs

Re:Reasons blog posts can be of higher scientific quality th... by afandian on Monday April 17, 2017 @06:21AM (#14130106)
Zenodo is a good example of this, as is Figshare. They allow the assignment of a DataCite DOI to some kind of digital asset (dataset, code, github repo etc) for citation https://zenodo.org/