News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Daring to Discuss Women in Science by Perceval on Monday June 07, 2010 @11:47PM (#1412921)
I can see why "encouragement and bias" might account for higher male achievement, but not why that would at the same time account for lower male achievement.
Re:Daring to Discuss Women in Science by snikolov on Tuesday June 08, 2010 @02:48AM (#1413221)
That's a very good point. This seems to be a major point against an explanation based solely on encouragement/bias.

In a solely encouragement/discouragement based theory, it might be that for some reason, males are encouraged as well as discouraged more strongly than females. I don't know of any (even anecdotal) evidence of this happening, so I wouldn't bet on it.

In any case, the underlying origins of these statistics are no doubt complex, messy and controversial.

Re:Daring to Discuss Women in Science by m-photonic on Tuesday June 08, 2010 @04:23AM (#1413318)
Males are not a homogenous group. There's no reason why some subgroups of males couldn't be negatively affected by social pressures just because other subgroups are positively affected.
Re:Daring to Discuss Women in Science by miri on Tuesday June 08, 2010 @05:31AM (#1413398)
Male nurses is probably the most glaring example of that.