News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Arturo Di Modica has a point by louisswiss on Sunday April 16, 2017 @09:24AM (#14125689)
A lot of great art was originally sponsored/commissioned by wealthy corporate benefactors (for example the Catholic Church and nobility in 15th century Italy).

I think it's important that the beholder/public in general is aware of the providence of a piece of art, yet I doubt banning corporate sponsorship of art would be a net positive for society.

Re:Arturo Di Modica has a point by rl3 on Sunday April 16, 2017 @10:39AM (#14125954)
It certainly wouldn't be, though in this particular case it could be argued that corporate sponsorship renders the work tasteless.