Re:Ex-Professor Says Dismissed Racketeering Case Is Still ‘D...
by azernik on Saturday April 15, 2017 @05:33PM
(#14122966)
UC Berkeley seems to handle this process just fine.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ex-Professor Says Dismissed Racketeering Case Is Still ‘D...
by castellar on Saturday April 15, 2017 @06:55PM
(#14123292)
Could you or someone possibly elaborate on this? Why does UC Berkeley have so much better luck with startups and spin-off companies/technologies when compared to other public institutions?
Re:Ex-Professor Says Dismissed Racketeering Case Is Still ‘D...
by azernik on Sunday April 16, 2017 @07:40AM
(#14125419)
It has an institutional culture (in the bureaucracy) of nurturing those startups. In particular, it has a very clear and permissive procedure for transferring work to private companies (see [1], under Outgoing MTA). You tell the university what materials (including IP) you want to use in your company, and the university negotiates a direct quid pro quo.
The Georgia Tech process, by contrast, seems totally ad hoc and amateur. "You can take stuff for free up to a point, as long as you agree to certain investment agreements with the university, and if you step over one of our unclear lines we will slap you down."