News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:EFF’s “Spying on Students” Report Highlights Tech Compani... by mirimir on Friday April 14, 2017 @11:16AM (#14114934)
There's the general rule of thumb that one's right to privacy is inversely proportional to one's power over others. Be it political, economic, or whatever. So a Presidential candidate deserves less privacy, because they pose more of a public risk. That distinction is clear in US libel law.
Re:EFF’s “Spying on Students” Report Highlights Tech Compani... by cmdrfred on Friday April 14, 2017 @11:23AM (#14114975)
That's US law, in the US truth is a sufficient argument against libel. This is the UN charter. Do you know of any other documentation that outlines article 12 in more detail? I'm coming up empty.
Re:EFF’s “Spying on Students” Report Highlights Tech Compani... by mirimir on Friday April 14, 2017 @12:12PM (#14115284)
Well, the UN charter dates from 1948. Those were heady days. I'm sure that there's much commentary. The legacy in the EU Right to Be Forgotten is clear. And more generally, in EU enforcement of privacy rights vs corporations.
Re:EFF’s “Spying on Students” Report Highlights Tech Compani... by bigbugbag on Friday April 14, 2017 @06:36PM (#14117955)
The UN charter does not apply in Europe, instead it's the 1950's council of Europe "European convention on Human Rights"[1] that applies.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Convention_on_Human_R...