This article really doesn't make any sense. My support of network-libertarianism notwithstanding, Arrington's major bone to pick is raising the angel limit, and his opening paragraph is about how Obama hasn't pushed through enough legislation to benefit the valley?

I don't get it. Seems like an article written out of frustrated cognitive dissonance, not one out of any cogent thinking.

At the end of the day, the system is the system. It's way easier to work the system's rules to change it (especially with the wealth that silicon valley has) than to ignore the system and tell it to go away.