News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Pitch decks we used to raise $1.1M.

Re:Pitch decks we used to raise $1.1M by alexbeloi on Thursday April 13, 2017 @02:30PM (#14109659)
My take is that it will become like upwork for creatives. Meaning, some amount of people will try it to land their first gig, and then immediately drop it when they get lowballed repeatedly or after they have a couple referrals. But there are a lot of eager freelancers to churn through.

They will be hated by everyone in the business and probably make boatloads of money.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Pitch decks we used to raise $1.1M by stuartlogan on Thursday April 13, 2017 @03:03PM (#14109962)
We have mechanisms to stop Twine being a race to the bottom which I won't go into detail here.

I wanted to keep this is about the deck rather than our positioning and hope its helpful to someone.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Pitch decks we used to raise $1.1M by nthtran on Friday April 14, 2017 @03:21AM (#14113115)
What are your mechanisms for this?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Pitch decks we used to raise $1.1M by stuartlogan on Monday April 17, 2017 @01:12PM (#14132600)
This article explains it: http://tech.co/twines-ceo-creative-marketplace-brings-qualit...
[ Parent | on HN ]