News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Y combinator, X chromosomes by scandox on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @05:32PM (#14101971)
> If more males are interested in working with technology than females

You put the "If" at the beginning of that sentence. It's a big "If". Imagine if that's just not true. Then just keep imagining that.

Re:Y combinator, X chromosomes by AnimalMuppet on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @07:26PM (#14102684)
And what if reality differs from what I'm imagining?

Yeah, I know, imagine that reality matches my imagination. But does it?

Re:Y combinator, X chromosomes by 824ueirwfjd on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @06:01PM (#14102149)
? imagine if it's not true? the numbers say that it is true...
Re:Y combinator, X chromosomes by sluggg on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @07:04PM (#14102567)
Don't you agree that the numbers are the way they are because of cultural stereotypes? If there were more female tech role models that females with a budding interest in tech can look up to, that would move the needle. I don't think you can simply say "look men are more interested in tech than women" and wipe your hands of the situation. We have to change our culture in order for more women to excel and therefore become role models for the next generation.
Re:Y combinator, X chromosomes by AnimalMuppet on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @07:28PM (#14102693)
> Don't you agree that the numbers are the way they are because of cultural stereotypes?

Partly because of cultural stereotypes. And partly because there actually are differences between males and females. The part that's because of cultural stereotypes, yes, we should fight. And the part that isn't, we should accept.

Re:Y combinator, X chromosomes by 824ueirwfjd on Thursday April 13, 2017 @03:55AM (#14105007)
+1
Re:Y combinator, X chromosomes by synicalx on Thursday April 13, 2017 @01:30AM (#14104378)
Well if it's not true then someone can go ahead and prove it?