See the danger? Intellectual discussions must now be passed through the filter of social narratives?
So pointing out any mathematical reality which has negative social implications is therefore a display of support for said negative social implications?
No. That's ridiculous. The world isn't rainbows and unicorns. And many morally commendable policies will and must fail mathematically.
Being the "messenger" that points out said mathematical realities isn't a display of support for fascism.
Also consider that perhaps there are social policies that are economically detrimental but perhaps they are considered worth the cost. There are human costs that economic models may not consider.
More generally, economics doesn't exist in a vacuum: for a working system of trade, you need rules, enforcement and redress. Thinking you can consider one without the other is like thinking Newton's Laws are the last word in physics.
It's about value, and different people value things very differently.
But Economics uses mathematics. Not for proofs (although some misled academics disagree), but for understanding of prior performance.
The real disaster is that mathematics is increasingly using economics and other social sciences as a filter for what is permissible to be calculated. :/
Hypothetical scenario: you calculate that people from country A are twice as likely to commit a crime in country B when compared to native citizens of country B. Ok. What do you do with that? I'll tell you what you don't do: you don't round up everyone from country A and kick them out and justify it with "mathematics." That is an incomplete view.
Perhaps I'm sorely misunderstanding what problem you see so please correct me of that's so.
If only the world worked in purely economic terms. My guess is that you might be labeled such things, perhaps not fairly, when making such arguments because such arguments ignore a huge part of the equation: the social and cultural realities we live with that color those issues.